Comparison of APL dialects

All APL dialects share core features, and at least the primitives are backwards compatible with those of APL.SV. However, there are important dialectal differences, the most significant of which are described in this article.

Flat versus Nested

One of the most significant differences between APLs is the choice of array model, namely nested or flat. Originally, all APLs were entirely flat, that is, the only scalar values supported were simple and had to be either numbers and characters, and an array had to be homogeneous, that is, consisting entirely of a single type. SHARP APL introduced the box as a third type, such that a box could hold any other array (including a box array), and this allowed for arrays contain other arrays. NARS introduced the nested array model, where any arrays can be an actual element of another array. Most currently maintained dialects (Dyalog APL, NARS2000, APL2, GNU APL, and others) use the nested array model.

Disclose

Disclose is defined, on scalars, to be the inverse of Enclose, giving the sole element of that scalar. This behavior is extended to arbitrary arrays in one of two ways: Mix, which combines all elements, and First, which returns only the first (in ravel order).

In the SHARP APL family, Disclose is written >, and given a function rank of 0, which causes it to behave as Mix. First is not a primitive.

In nested APL dialects, Disclose is written ⊃, and it was extended to First by NARS and to Mix by APL2. The other possible meaning is given the glyph ↑ and named "Mix" or "First" (not "Disclose") as appropriate. Dialects might choose either assignment of glyphs, and Dyalog APL and APL*PLUS allow either to be chosen based on Migration Level.

Glyph	Meaning	Dialects
>	Mix	SHARP APL, A, A+
⊃	Mix	APL2, ISO/IEC 13751:2001, APLX, NARS2000, GNU APL, Kap
⊃	First	ngn/apl, Co-dfns, dzaima/APL, April
⊃	Configurable	Dyalog APL, APL*PLUS, APL+Win, APL64

Numeric types

Main article: Number

Traditionally, APL supports only one numeric type that is visible to the user, such as a floating-point number, or complex number whose components are floating-point. Other numeric types may be used by the implementation, but only for optimization: for example, APL\360 uses packed 1-bit Boolean and 4-bit integer arrays that are automatically converted to float if an operation yields a value that doesn't fit in the type. ISO/IEC 13751:2001 specifies that different representations of a number must be indistinguishable to a conforming program (which can call primitives but not implementation-specific system functions).

Most often the numeric type is a 64-bit float, for instance HFP in early IBM dialects and IEEE 754 in new dialects since the 1980s. Dyalog APL supports 128-bit decimal floats by setting ⎕FR. Modern dialects tend to support complex numbers, with exceptions including dzaima/APL, APLX, and APL+Win. Dialects with complex numbers also extend Circular (○) to left arguments designed for complex numbers.

Some newer dialects provide additional types that are distinguishable from floats, often by greater precision. Extended-precision integers are one possibility: for example, dzaima/APL provides these if requested with a trailing L in a numeric literal or ⎕BIG, while Kap uses exact rational numbers by default. NARS2000 supports numerous numeric types, and April provides access to the Common Lisp numeric tower, which also includes many types. GNU APL doesn't support arbitrary precision, but uses 64-bit integers by default, much like J or K.

Conformability

All APLs implement scalar extension in scalar dyadic functions, and Each if present. However, a few dialects differ in their support for singleton extension. Most support it fully, so that a singleton of any rank is extended. APL2 supports it only for scalars and one-element vectors (and ISO/IEC_13751:2001 specifies only this behavior), and dzaima/APL and Kap support scalar extension only.

Furthermore, dialects that implement the Rank operator differ in their conformability rules for frames. Dyalog APL and SHARP APL implement scalar agreement only, NARS2000 implements singleton agreement, and A+ implements leading axis agreement (in addition to extra options allowing the programmer to specify outer-product-like treatment of some axes).

Index origin

A few dialects fix the index origin to 0 rather than allowing it to be configured: A+, APL#, ngn/apl, Co-dfns, and Kap.

Depth

Dyalog APL defines Depth (≡) to return negative numbers when the depth is uneven. Most other dialects instead define it to return the maximum depth. The original NARS paper assigned the glyph to a function called Simple, which simply answered if the argument was simple or not, without reporting the actual depth. It was thus equivalent to today's 1=≡,Y.

Language features

The following table shows support for various APL features: nesting either with boxes or the nested array model, defined functions or similar syntax, control structures, dfn-style anonymous functions, tacit programming, particularly with trains, complex numbers, arbitrary-precision integers, Unicode support, and namespaces or a similar encapsulation feature. The precise syntax and capabilities of these features might differ between dialects that support them.

Dialects included in the first row include APL\360, APL\1130, APL*PLUS before II, APL/700, APL.SV, APL 5100, MCM/70, VS APL, APL\3000, and Aplette. Extended Dyalog APL and Dyalog APL Vision have the same feature-set as Dyalog APL.

Dialect	Nesting	Tradfns	Control	Dfns	Tacit	Complex	Big int	Unicode	Namespace
APL\360, APL.SV, …	No	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	No	No
SHARP APL	Boxes	Yes	No	No	No	Yes	No	No	No
NARS	Nested	Yes	No	direct def	No	No	No	No	No
Dyalog APL	Nested	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes
APL2	Nested	Yes	No	No	No	Yes	No	No	Yes
A+	Boxes	Yes	Yes	No	Some	No	No	No	No
APL*PLUS II	Nested	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	No	No
SAX	Boxes	Yes	Yes	No	Some	No	No	No	No
APL*PLUS III	Nested	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	No
APL+Win	Nested	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	Yes
APLX	Nested	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	No	No	No
NARS2000	Nested	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	UCS-2	No
VisualAPL	Nested	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	No	Yes	Yes
APL#	Nested	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes
ngn/apl	Nested	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No
GNU APL	Nested	Yes	If-else	Limited	No	Yes	No	Yes	Yes
Co-dfns	Nested	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Partial
April	Nested	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
dzaima/APL	Nested	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	Yes	Yes
APL\iv	Lists	No	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	Yes	No
Kap	Nested	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes	Yes
APL64	Nested	Yes	Yes	No	No	No	No	Yes	Yes

Development and platform

Shown are the release year, year of last release for inactive languages, withdrawal year for discontinued products, developer, implementation language, and host system. Systems capable of being compiled for multiple native hosts are indicated as "portable".

Dialect	Released	Inactive	Withdrawn	Developer	Language	Host
APL\1130	1968		?	IBM	1130 assembler	IBM 1130
APL\360	1968	1972	2012	IBM	BAL	S/360–z/Architecture, IBM 5100+
APL*PLUS	1970	1995	2012	STSC	BAL, C	S/370, TRS-80, portable
APL/700	1971?		?	Burroughs	ALGOL 60	Burroughs B 6700/B 7700
APL.SV	1973		?	IBM	BAL
APL 5100	1976		?	IBM	BAL	IBM 5100
MCM/70	1974		?	MCM		MCM/70
VS APL	1976		?	IBM	BAL	OS/VS, DOS/VS
SHARP APL	1976	1989	1993?	IPSA		S/370, later portable
APL\3000	1976		?	Hewlett-Packard		HP 3000 Series II / III
NARS	1981		?	STSC	370 assembler, APL	System/370
Dyalog APL	1983			Dyalog Ltd.	C, C++, APL	Portable
A+	1988	2014		Arthur Whitney	C++	Portable
APL2	1984			IBM		IBM mainframes, portable
SAX	1993	2000	2017?	Soliton	C	Portable
APL+Win	1995	2019		APL2000		Portable
APLX	2002	2016	2016	MicroAPL Ltd.	C, C++	Portable
NARS2000	2006	2019		Bob Smith	C, APL	Portable
VisualAPL	2009		2011	APL2000	C#	.NET (CLI)
APL#	2010		2012	Dyalog Ltd.	C#	.NET (CLI)
ngn/apl	2011	2018		Nick Nickolov	Javascript	In-browser, Node.js
GNU APL	2013			Jürgen Sauermann	C++	Portable
Aplette	2014	2020		Greg F. Johnson	C	Portable
Co-dfns	2014			Aaron Hsu	Dyalog APL	C, ArrayFire (GPU) targets
April	2018			Andrew Sengul	Common Lisp	Common Lisp runtime
dzaima/APL	2018	2020		dzaima	Java, Processing	JVM, Android
APL\iv	2018	2019		ktye	Go	Portable
Extended Dyalog APL	2018	2021		Adám Brudzewsky	Dyalog APL	Dyalog APL
Kap	2020			Elias Mårtenson	Kotlin	Portable
APL64	2022			APL2000	C#	Portable
Dyalog APL Vision	2022			Adám Brudzewsky	Dyalog APL	Dyalog APL

External links

• Omnibar lists all glyphs with their meanings and allows custom comparisons between dialects:
  File:Omnibar