Leading axis agreement: Difference between revisions
(Remove redirect, add basic explanation and examples) Tag: Removed redirect |
|||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
== Aligning axes using the Rank operator == | == Aligning axes using the Rank operator == | ||
When using the [[Rank (operator)|Rank operator]] for dyadic functions as in <source lang=apl inline>X (f⍤m n) Y</source>, the [[Frame|frames]] of <source lang=apl inline>X</source> and <source lang=apl inline>Y</source> are checked for conformability. Combined with leading axis agreement, the Rank operator can be used to align the axes to be matched. | When using the [[Rank (operator)|Rank operator]] for dyadic functions as in <source lang=apl inline>X (f⍤m n) Y</source>, the [[Frame|frames]] of <source lang=apl inline>X</source> and <source lang=apl inline>Y</source> are checked for conformability. Combined with leading axis agreement, the Rank operator can be used to align the [[axis|axes]] to be matched. | ||
<source lang=j> | <source lang=j> | ||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
</source> | </source> | ||
{{Works in|[[J]]}} | {{Works in|[[J]]}} | ||
[[Category:Leading axis theory]][[Category:Function characteristics]][[Category:Conformability]]{{APL features}} |
Revision as of 07:19, 18 February 2021
Leading axis agreement, sometimes called prefix agreement, is a conformability rule designed for leading axis theory. It states that a dyadic scalar function can be applied between two arrays only if one of their shapes is a prefix of the other. The shape of the result is that of the argument with higher rank.
Examples
The following examples use J for demonstration purposes.
A scalar dyadic function works when the two arrays have the same shape:
]x =: 2 3 $ 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 ]y =: 2 3 $ i.6 0 1 2 3 4 5 x + y 10 11 12 13 14 15
as well as when one is a scalar:
]x =: 10 10 ]y =: 2 3 $ i.6 0 1 2 3 4 5 x + y 10 11 12 13 14 15
The two cases above are already supported in other APLs in the form of scalar extension. J goes one step further, allowing the lower-rank array argument to have nonzero rank, as long as the leading dimensions match:
]x =: 10 20 10 20 ]y =: 2 3 $ i.6 0 1 2 3 4 5 x + y 10 11 12 23 24 25
In this case, x
has shape 2
and y
has shape 2 3
. Since the leading axes agree and the rank difference is 1, each atom (or 0-cell) of x
is matched with each row (or 1-cell) of y
, and the two rows in the result are the results of 10 + 0 1 2
and 20 + 3 4 5
, respectively.
Aligning axes using the Rank operator
When using the Rank operator for dyadic functions as in X (f⍤m n) Y
, the frames of X
and Y
are checked for conformability. Combined with leading axis agreement, the Rank operator can be used to align the axes to be matched.
NB. $x : 2|3 NB. $y : |3 2 NB. ------------------ NB. $x +"1 2 y : 2 3 2 ]x =: 2 3 $ 10 20 30 40 50 60 10 20 30 40 50 60 ]y =: 3 2 $ 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 x +"1 2 y 11 12 23 24 35 36 41 42 53 54 65 66
APL features [edit] | |
---|---|
Built-ins | Primitives (functions, operators) ∙ Quad name |
Array model | Shape ∙ Rank ∙ Depth ∙ Bound ∙ Index (Indexing) ∙ Axis ∙ Ravel ∙ Ravel order ∙ Element ∙ Scalar ∙ Vector ∙ Matrix ∙ Simple scalar ∙ Simple array ∙ Nested array ∙ Cell ∙ Major cell ∙ Subarray ∙ Empty array ∙ Prototype |
Data types | Number (Boolean, Complex number) ∙ Character (String) ∙ Box ∙ Namespace ∙ Function array |
Concepts and paradigms | Conformability (Scalar extension, Leading axis agreement) ∙ Scalar function (Pervasion) ∙ Identity element ∙ Complex floor ∙ Array ordering (Total) ∙ Tacit programming (Function composition, Close composition) ∙ Glyph ∙ Leading axis theory ∙ Major cell search ∙ First-class function |
Errors | LIMIT ERROR ∙ RANK ERROR ∙ SYNTAX ERROR ∙ DOMAIN ERROR ∙ LENGTH ERROR ∙ INDEX ERROR ∙ VALUE ERROR ∙ EVOLUTION ERROR |