Tacit programming

From APL Wiki
Revision as of 08:00, 11 August 2020 by Andrii Makukha (talk | contribs) (→‎Debugging)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tacit functions apply to implicit arguments. This is in contrast to the explicit use of arguments in dfns ( ) and tradfns (which have named arguments). Some APL dialects allow to combine functions into trains following a small set of rules. This allows creating complex derived functions without specifying any arguments explicitly.

Known dialects which implement trains are Dyalog APL, dzaima/APL, ngn/apl and NARS2000.

Primitives

All primitive functions are tacit. Some APLs allow primitive functions to be named.

      plus  +
      times  ×
      6 times 3 plus 5
48

Derived functions

Functions derived from a monadic operator and an operand, or from a dyadic operator and two operands are tacit functions:

      Sum  +/
      Sum 10
55

      Dot  +.×
      3 1 4 dot 2 7 1
17

Derived operators

A dyadic operator with its right operand forms a tacit monadic operator:

      1(+2)10
12
      Twice  2
      1 +Twice 10
12

Trains

A train is a series of functions in isolation. An isolated function is either surrounded by parentheses or named. Below, and refer to the arguments of the train. f, g, and h are functions (which themselves can be tacit or not), and A is an array. The arguments are processed by the following rules:

A 2-train is an atop:

  (g h) 
g (  h )
 (g h) 
g ( h )

A 3-train is a fork:

  (f g h) 
(  f ) g (  h )
 (f g h) 
( f ) g ( h )

The left tine of a fork can be an array:

  (A g h)
A g (  h )
 (A g h) 
A g ( h )

Only dzaima/APL allows (A h), which it treats as Ah.[1] See Bind.

Debugging

In Dyalog APL, analysis of trains is assisted by a user command ]Boxing on. This is achieved by executing the command ]Boxing on and then entering a train without any parameters. A structure of the train will be displayed.

For example, the "accursed train" from the section below can be analysed like this:

      ]Boxing on
Was OFF
      ((+.×⊢~∘.×)1↓⍳)     ⍝ the train to be analysed
┌───────────────────────────────┬───────┐
│┌───────────┬─────────────────┐│┌─┬─┬─┐│
││┌───────┬─┐│┌─┬─┬───────────┐│││1││
│││┌─┬─┬─┐││││~│┌───────┬─┐│││└─┴─┴─┘│
││││+.×││ │││  ││┌─┬─┬─┐│││││       
│││└─┴─┴─┘│ │││  │││.×││ ││││       
││└───────┴─┘││  ││└─┴─┴─┘│ ││││       
││           ││  │└───────┴─┘│││       
││           │└─┴─┴───────────┘││       
│└───────────┴─────────────────┘│       
└───────────────────────────────┴───────┘

Alternatively, a train can be represented in form of a tree:

      ]Boxing on -trains=tree
Was ON -trains=box
      ((+.×⊢~∘.×)1↓⍳)     ⍝ the train to be analysed
     ┌───┴───┐  
   ┌─┴─┐   ┌─┼─┐
    ┌─┼─┐ 1  
 ┌─┘  ~       
 .     ┌─┘      
┌┴┐    .        
+ ×   ┌┴┐       
       ×

Or fully parenthesised:

      ]Boxing on -trains=parens
Was OFF -trains=box
      ((+.×⊢~∘.×)1↓⍳)     ⍝ the train to be analysed
(((+.×))(⊢~((∘.×))))(1↓⍳)

Examples

One of the major benefits of tacit programming is the ability to convey a short, well-defined idea as an isolated expression. This aids both human readability (semantic density) and the computer's ability to interpret code, potentially executing special code for particular idioms.

Plus and minus

      (+,-) 2     ⍝ ±2
2 ¯2
      5 (+,-) 2   ⍝ 5±2
7 3

Arithmetic mean

      (+÷≢) 10       ⍝ Mean of the first ten integers
5.5
      (+÷≢) 5 4⍴⍳4    ⍝ Mean of columns in a matrix
1 2 3 4

Fractions

We can convert decimal numbers to fractions. For example, we can convert to the improper fraction with

      (1∧⊢,÷)2.625
21 8

Alternatively, we can convert it to the mixed fraction with a mixed fraction:

      (10 1⊤,÷)2.625
2 5 8

Is it a palindrome?

      (⌽≡⊢)'racecar'
1
      (⌽≡⊢)'racecat'
0

Split delimited text

      ','()'comma,delimited,text'
┌─────┬─────────┬────┐
commadelimitedtext
└─────┴─────────┴────┘
      ' '()'space delimited text'
┌─────┬─────────┬────┐
spacedelimitedtext
└─────┴─────────┴────┘

Component of a vector in the direction of another vector

Sometimes a train can make an expression nicely resemble its equivalent definition in traditional mathematical notation. As an example, here is a program to compute the component of a vector in the direction of another vector Failed to parse (MathML with SVG or PNG fallback (recommended for modern browsers and accessibility tools): Invalid response ("Math extension cannot connect to Restbase.") from server "https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/":): {\displaystyle \textbf{b}} :

      Root  *÷              ⍝ Nth root
      Norm  2 Root +.×       ⍝ Magnitude (norm) of numeric vector in Euclidean space
      Unit  ⊢÷Norm            ⍝ Unit vector in direction of vector ⍵
      InDirOf  (⊢×+.×)Unit   ⍝ Component of vector ⍺ in direction of vector ⍵
      3 5 2 InDirOf 0 0 1      ⍝ Trivial example
0 0 2

For a more parallel comparison of the notations, see the comparison with traditional mathematics.

The Number of the Beast

The following expression for computing the number of the Beast (and of I.P. Sharp's APL-based email system, 666 BOX) nicely illustrates how to read a train.

      ((+.×⊢~∘.×)1↓⍳)17 ⍝ Accursed train
666

First, ((+.×⊢~∘.×)1↓⍳) is supplied with only one argument 17 and is thus interpreted monadically.

Second, (+.×⊢~∘.×)1↓⍳ is a 4-train: reading right-to-left, the last 3 components are interpreted as the fork 1↓⍳ and the 4-train is interpreted as the atop (+.×⊢~∘.×)(1↓⍳). Similarly, (+.×⊢~∘.×) is also a 4-train and interpreted as the atop +.×(⊢~∘.×).

Thus the accursed train is interpreted as ((+.×(⊢~∘.×))(1↓⍳))17. Having read the train, we now evaluate it monadically.

      ((+.×(⊢~∘.×))(1↓⍳))17 ⍝ Accursed train as an atop over a fork atop a fork
      +.×(⊢~∘.×)1↓⍳17       ⍝ Atop evalution
      +.×(1↓⍳17)~∘.×1↓⍳17  ⍝ Fork evalution
      +.×(1↓⍳17)~∘.×1↓⍳17   ⍝ ⊢ evaluation
      +.×2 3 5 7 11 13 15 17 ⍝ numbers 2 through 17 without those appearing in their multiplication table are primes
666                           ⍝ the sum of the squares of the primes up to 17

Note that ((⍨∘.×)1↓⍳) is a train computing primes up to the given input.

A more satisfying variation of the accursed train is the following.

      (⍎⊢,⍕)'((+.×⍨⊢~∘.×⍨)1↓⍳)'                    ⍝ Accursed train 2.0
      (⊢,⍕)'((+.×⍨⊢~∘.×⍨)1↓⍳)'                    ⍝ 4-train intepreted as an atop
      ('((+.×⍨⊢~∘.×⍨)1↓⍳)'),⍕'((+.×⍨⊢~∘.×⍨)1↓⍳)' ⍝ fork evaluation
      '((+.×⍨⊢~∘.×⍨)1↓⍳)','17'                      ⍝ ⊢ evaluation and ⍕∘≢ evaluation
      '((+.×⍨⊢~∘.×⍨)1↓⍳)17'                         ⍝ , evaluation
666                                                  ⍝ ⍎ executes original Accursed train

External links

Tutorials

Documentation

References

  1. dzaima/APL: Differences from Dyalog APL. Retrieved 09 Jan 2020.


APL syntax [edit]
General Comparison with traditional mathematicsPrecedenceTacit programming
Array Numeric literalStringStrand notationObject literalArray notation
Function ArgumentFunction valenceDerived functionDerived operatorNiladic functionMonadic functionDyadic functionAmbivalent functionTradfnDfnFunction train
Operator OperandOperator valenceTradopDopDerived operator
Assignment MultipleIndexedSelectiveModified
Other Function axisBranchQuad nameSystem commandUser commandKeywordDot notationFunction-operator overloading