User talk:⊂⍺m: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

User talk:⊂⍺m (view source)

Revision as of 22:07, 23 July 2023

521 bytes removed , 22:07, 23 July 2023

Outer product discussion moved to associated Discussion page

⊂⍺m

trusted

83

edits

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-The Falkoff/Iverson quote, while providing illuminating historical context, is a bit misleading—the reduction in inner product does not collapse any axes relative to the result shape, as it is applied only within each enclosure/box of the outer product. Rather, in <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>‪f/¨ (⊂[⍴⍴x]x)∘.g ⊂[1]y‬</syntaxhighlight> the enclosure of one axis of each argument, prior to the outer product operation, is responsible for the collapsing of dimensions.
+== Internship? ==
-Equivalently from a slightly different angle, if we use the model <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>X⊂⍤(f/)⍤g⍤1⍤1 99⊢Y⍉⍨¯1⌽⍳≢⍴Y</syntaxhighlight>, the collapsing of dimensions is due more generally to <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>⊂⍤…⍤g⍤1</syntaxhighlight> mapping two vectors to a scalar. Clearly the same holds for <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>…⊂⍤g⍤1…</syntaxhighlight>, i.e., the same expression with the reduction removed.
+Based on your self-description, you might be interested in an internship at Dyalog. If so, then feel free to write an email to careers@dyalog.com — if not, then feel free to ignore, and I won't bother you about it again.
-[[User:⊂⍺m|⊂⍺m]] ([[User talk:⊂⍺m|talk]]) 22:45, 25 June 2023 (UTC) ⊂⍺m
+: Yes, I think this would be a great hands-on learning opportunity. Thank you for reaching out with the suggestion, I appreciate it. I will follow up with an email to them shortly and we will see what comes of it. [[User:⊂⍺m|⊂⍺m]] ([[User talk:⊂⍺m|talk]]) 20:15, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

User talk:⊂⍺m: Difference between revisions

User talk:⊂⍺m (view source)

Revision as of 22:07, 23 July 2023

Navigation menu

Search