Talk:Zilde: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "== Value versus glyph == It may be cleaner to separate the value Zilde from the glyph Zero-tilde. I think Zilde refers to the value and not the glyph because I'd feel comfort...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
It may be cleaner to separate the value Zilde from the glyph Zero-tilde. I think Zilde refers to the value and not the glyph because I'd feel comfortable saying of a scalar that its "shape is Zilde". --[[User:Marshall|Marshall]] ([[User talk:Marshall|talk]]) 12:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC) | It may be cleaner to separate the value Zilde from the glyph Zero-tilde. I think Zilde refers to the value and not the glyph because I'd feel comfortable saying of a scalar that its "shape is Zilde". --[[User:Marshall|Marshall]] ([[User talk:Marshall|talk]]) 12:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
:You might feel comfortable with that, but the glyph (with no inherent value) it is actually called "apl functional symbol zilde" by Unicode. Zilde is surely the zero-tilde glyph while the value is the empty numeric vector. [[User:Adám Brudzewsky|Adám Brudzewsky]] ([[User talk:Adám Brudzewsky|talk]]) 14:30, 1 May 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:30, 1 May 2020
Value versus glyph
It may be cleaner to separate the value Zilde from the glyph Zero-tilde. I think Zilde refers to the value and not the glyph because I'd feel comfortable saying of a scalar that its "shape is Zilde". --Marshall (talk) 12:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- You might feel comfortable with that, but the glyph (with no inherent value) it is actually called "apl functional symbol zilde" by Unicode. Zilde is surely the zero-tilde glyph while the value is the empty numeric vector. Adám Brudzewsky (talk) 14:30, 1 May 2020 (UTC)