Difference between revisions of "Talk:Simple examples"

From APL Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
You're totally right. It is plain wrong because it tries to use windowed reduction in APL like infix in J. An easy fix would be to combine <source lang=apl inline>(+⌿÷≢)</source> with concatenation <source lang=apl inline>,</source> by atop so that it looks like <source lang=apl inline>2((+⌿÷≢),)/3 4.5 7 21</source> (or <source lang=apl inline>2(+⌿÷≢)⍤,/3 4.5 7 21</source> in Dyalog 18.0); a general solution (allowing window size higher than 2) would be to extract windows and apply average on each of them <source lang=apl inline>(+⌿÷≢)¨ 2,/3 4.5 7 21</source>. I doubt if it's worth keeping either way in this context. --[[User:Bubbler|Bubbler]] ([[User talk:Bubbler|talk]]) 14:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 
You're totally right. It is plain wrong because it tries to use windowed reduction in APL like infix in J. An easy fix would be to combine <source lang=apl inline>(+⌿÷≢)</source> with concatenation <source lang=apl inline>,</source> by atop so that it looks like <source lang=apl inline>2((+⌿÷≢),)/3 4.5 7 21</source> (or <source lang=apl inline>2(+⌿÷≢)⍤,/3 4.5 7 21</source> in Dyalog 18.0); a general solution (allowing window size higher than 2) would be to extract windows and apply average on each of them <source lang=apl inline>(+⌿÷≢)¨ 2,/3 4.5 7 21</source>. I doubt if it's worth keeping either way in this context. --[[User:Bubbler|Bubbler]] ([[User talk:Bubbler|talk]]) 14:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 +
:I've removed the moving average part [[User:Adám Brudzewsky|Adám Brudzewsky]] ([[User talk:Adám Brudzewsky|talk]]) 22:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:45, 27 June 2020

Moving average

Neither

   2 mave 3 4.5 7 21

nor

   2(+⌿÷≢)/3 4.5 7 21

work in Dyalog APL 18 or GNU APL. --Andrii Makukha (talk) 15:19, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

You're totally right. It is plain wrong because it tries to use windowed reduction in APL like infix in J. An easy fix would be to combine (+÷≢) with concatenation , by atop so that it looks like 2((+÷≢),)/3 4.5 7 21 (or 2(+÷≢),/3 4.5 7 21 in Dyalog 18.0); a general solution (allowing window size higher than 2) would be to extract windows and apply average on each of them (+÷≢)¨ 2,/3 4.5 7 21. I doubt if it's worth keeping either way in this context. --Bubbler (talk) 14:07, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

I've removed the moving average part Adám Brudzewsky (talk) 22:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)