Talk:Partition representations: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "''"We consider two partitions of a vector to be identical if they match, ignoring prototypes."'' If two arrays match, their prototypes also match. If the final phrase has an...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
I suggest using "zero-length divisions". | I suggest using "zero-length divisions". | ||
--[[User:Phil Last|Phil Last]] ([[User talk:Phil Last|talk]]) 16:02, 27 January 2020 (UTC) | --[[User:Phil Last|Phil Last]] ([[User talk:Phil Last|talk]]) 16:02, 27 January 2020 (UTC) | ||
Couldn't a division be empty without being zero-length? [[User:Adám Brudzewsky|Adám Brudzewsky]] ([[User talk:Adám Brudzewsky|talk]]) | |||
Revision as of 21:18, 27 January 2020
"We consider two partitions of a vector to be identical if they match, ignoring prototypes."
If two arrays match, their prototypes also match.
If the final phrase has any non-trivial meaning that must be one of:
- "ignoring zero-length divisions"
- "ignoring divisions of any length that match their own prototypes."
In neither case do they coincide with the prototype of the partition itself unless the first division is itself one or other of them. The second could be formed from a blank length of the original vector so could not be ignored.
I suggest using "zero-length divisions". --Phil Last (talk) 16:02, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Couldn't a division be empty without being zero-length? Adám Brudzewsky (talk)