Talk:Array notation design considerations: Difference between revisions

Talk:Array notation design considerations (view source)

507 bytes added , 09:44, 21 August 2022

no edit summary

19

edits

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 :Relevance is relative; see [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Due_and_undue_weight|undue weight]]. Compare to [[Control_structure#History|control structures]] which has much less detail for a more written-about topic. The sources are there as citations if the reader wants to dig into them.
 :The description of APL#'s notation as consisting of "name-value pairs" with "major and minor separators being line-end and assignment arrow" is wrong: that's not the syntax it uses, and it makes it seem closer to current array notation than it is. --[[User:Marshall|Marshall]] ([[User talk:Marshall|talk]]) 23:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
+----
+:consisting of "name-value pairs" with "major and minor separators being line-end and assignment arrow"
+is not what I wrote but my description is accurate.
+What I've added during the past few dayswas an attempt to fill in the gaps with a few of the insights that led to my original and evolving design. Nevertheless, if you want to rewrite or delete anything or everything I've written or the entire page, it's a wiki. Go ahead. I didn't know the page existed until a week ago. I'll leave it to you.