Split composition: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
396 bytes added ,  08:45, 23 September 2022
m
no edit summary
m (Language source block, instead of pre)
mNo edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Split-compose''' is a [[tacit]] construct, used to pre-process its argument(s) with the left and right-most operand before applying the middle operand between the result. Given functions <source lang=apl inline>f</source>, <source lang=apl inline>g</source>, and <source lang=apl inline>h</source>, the split composition on arguments <source lang=apl inline>x</source> and <source lang=apl inline>y</source> is defined as <source lang=apl inline>(f x) g (h y)</source>.
{{Glyphbox|f⍛g∘h}}[[File:Split_composition.png|frameless|right|200px]]
'''Split composition''' is a [[tacit]] pattern, used to pre-process argument(s) with the outer-most operands before applying the middle operand between the result. Given functions <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>f</syntaxhighlight>, <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>g</syntaxhighlight>, and <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>h</syntaxhighlight>, a split composition on arguments <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>x</syntaxhighlight> and <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>y</syntaxhighlight> is defined as <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>(f x) g (h y)</syntaxhighlight>.


The name was introduced by the [[I|I language]], where it is represented with <source lang=apl inline>O</source>, a higher-order function that applies first to the middle [[function]] and then the two outer functions (<source lang=apl inline>O</source> also represents the [[Over]] operator). It doesn't appear as a primitive in any APL, nor can it, because it is a [[composition]] of three functions, while a [[Function composition|compositional operator]] can take no more than two [[operands]]. This situation is identical to that of the [[fork]]. Both split-compose and fork can be constructed using two companion operators, tying together the three involved functions.
This construct was introduced by the [[I|I language]] as "split-compose", where it is represented with <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>O</syntaxhighlight> which also represents the [[Over]] operator - as it too is a split composition with identical outer operands.  


In [[Extended Dyalog APL]] and [[dzaima/APL]], the construct can be formed using [[Reverse Compose]] (<code>⍛</code>) and [[Compose]] (<code>∘</code>). In this example, we multiply the [[interval]] (integers up until) of the left argument, with the [[Magnitude]] of the right:
This doesn't appear as a primitive in any APL, nor can it, because it [[composition|composes]] three functions, while a [[Function composition|compositional operator]] can take no more than two [[operands]]. This situation is identical to that of the [[fork]]. Both split compositions and forks can be constructed using companion operators, tying together the three involved functions.
<source lang=apl>
 
In [[Extended Dyalog APL]] and [[dzaima/APL]], a split composition can be formed using [[Reverse Compose]] (<code>⍛</code>) and [[Compose]] (<code>∘</code>). In this example, we multiply the [[interval]] (integers up until) of the left argument, with the [[Magnitude]] of the right:
<syntaxhighlight lang=apl>
       5 ⍳⍛×∘| 5 ¯8 ¯2 ¯5 3
       5 ⍳⍛×∘| 5 ¯8 ¯2 ¯5 3
5 16 6 20 15
5 16 6 20 15
</source>
</syntaxhighlight>
This is evaluated as <source lang=apl inline>(⍳5) × (|5 ¯8 ¯2 ¯5 3)</source>. A further example concatenates the reciprocal of the left argument with the negation of the right:
This is evaluated as <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>(⍳5) × (|5 ¯8 ¯2 ¯5 3)</syntaxhighlight>. A further example concatenates the reciprocal of the left argument with the negation of the right:
<source lang=apl>
<syntaxhighlight lang=apl>
       2(,⍨∘÷⍨∘-⍨⍨)4
       2 ÷⍛,- 4
0.5 ¯4
0.5 ¯4
</source>
</syntaxhighlight>
This is evaluated as <source lang=apl inline>(÷2) × (-4)</source>.
This is evaluated as <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>(÷2) × (-4)</syntaxhighlight>.
== Alternatives ==
== Alternatives ==


In dialects that lack Reverse Compose (and even Compose), split-compose can be written either by defining the missing operator(s), or as a single derived function or [[fork]], if this is supported. For example, in [[Dyalog APL]] the expression can be formed with Compose and [[Commute]] (<source lang=apl inline>⍨</source>) as <source lang=apl inline>g⍨∘f⍨∘h</source>:
In dialects that lack Reverse Compose (and even Compose), split compositions can be denoted either by defining the missing operator(s), or as a single derived function or [[fork]], if this is supported. For example, in [[Dyalog APL]] the pattern can be formed with Compose and [[Commute]] (<syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>⍨</syntaxhighlight>) as <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>g⍨∘f⍨∘h</syntaxhighlight>:
<source lang=apl>
<syntaxhighlight lang=apl>
       5 ×⍨∘⍳⍨∘| 5 ¯8 ¯2 ¯5 3
       5 ×⍨∘⍳⍨∘| 5 ¯8 ¯2 ¯5 3
5 16 6 20 15
5 16 6 20 15
       2(,⍨∘÷⍨∘-)4
       2(,⍨∘÷⍨∘-)4
0.5 ¯4
0.5 ¯4
</source>
</syntaxhighlight>
Note that <source lang=apl inline>g∘h⍨∘f⍨</source> applies <source lang=apl inline>f</source> before <source lang=apl inline>h</source> which can matter for functions with side effects. For example, consider the following where <source lang=apl inline>'x' f⍛g∘h 'y'</source> would print <code>hfg</code>:
Note that <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>g∘h⍨∘f⍨</syntaxhighlight> applies <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>f</syntaxhighlight> before <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>h</syntaxhighlight> which can matter for functions with side effects. For example, consider the following where <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>'x' f⍛g∘h 'y'</syntaxhighlight> would print <code>hfg</code>:
<source lang=apl>
<syntaxhighlight lang=apl>
       f←{⍞←⊃⎕SI}
       f←{⍞←⊃⎕SI}
       g←{⍞←⊃⎕SI}
       g←{⍞←⊃⎕SI}
Line 32: Line 35:
       'x' g∘h⍨∘f⍨ 'y'
       'x' g∘h⍨∘f⍨ 'y'
fhg
fhg
</source>
</syntaxhighlight>
The equivalent fork is <source lang=apl inline>f⍤⊣ g h⍤⊢</source>, for example:
The equivalent fork is <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>f⍤⊣ g h⍤⊢</syntaxhighlight>, for example:
<source lang=apl>
<syntaxhighlight lang=apl>
       5 (⍳⍤⊣×|⍤⊢) 5 ¯8 ¯2 ¯5 3
       5 (⍳⍤⊣×|⍤⊢) 5 ¯8 ¯2 ¯5 3
5 16 6 20 15
5 16 6 20 15
       2(÷⍤⊣,-⍤⊢)4
       2(÷⍤⊣,-⍤⊢)4
0.5 ¯4
0.5 ¯4
</source>
</syntaxhighlight>
{{APL syntax}}[[Category:Primitive operators]]
{{APL syntax}}[[Category:Primitive operators]]
26

edits

Navigation menu