Monadic operator: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
90 bytes added ,  22:02, 10 September 2022
m
Text replacement - "</source>" to "</syntaxhighlight>"
m (Operators category)
m (Text replacement - "</source>" to "</syntaxhighlight>")
Line 1: Line 1:
In [[APL syntax]], a '''monadic operator''' (or '''adverb''') is an [[operator]] with one [[operand]], which is written to the operator's left. [[Outer Product]] is usually also considered a monadic operator, even though it is written with two symbols and the operand on the right. A [[specified axis]] may also be considered a monadic operator, even though its syntax is anomalous: it is written with brackets, and can apply to the [[Reduce]] and [[Scan]] operators even though operators are not usually allowed to be operands.
In [[APL syntax]], a '''monadic operator''' (or '''adverb''') is an [[operator]] with one [[operand]], which is written to the operator's left. [[Outer Product]] is usually also considered a monadic operator, even though it is written with two symbols and the operand on the right. A [[specified axis]] may also be considered a monadic operator, even though its syntax is anomalous: it is written with brackets, and can apply to the [[Reduce]] and [[Scan]] operators even though operators are not usually allowed to be operands.


The term "monadic operator" refers to the [[operator valence|valence]] of the operator itself, that is, the number of operands. When applied, it produces a [[derived function]], which can have a different [[function valence]]. For example, the [[Windowed Reduce|2-wise reduction]] <source lang=apl inline>2 =/ 1 2 2 3</source> illustrates the monadic operator [[Reduce]] (<source lang=apl inline>/</source>) applied to a single operand <source lang=apl inline>=</source>, and then to two arguments <source lang=apl inline>2</source> and <source lang=apl inline>1 2 2 3</source>. We say it is a "monadic operator called dyadically".
The term "monadic operator" refers to the [[operator valence|valence]] of the operator itself, that is, the number of operands. When applied, it produces a [[derived function]], which can have a different [[function valence]]. For example, the [[Windowed Reduce|2-wise reduction]] <source lang=apl inline>2 =/ 1 2 2 3</syntaxhighlight> illustrates the monadic operator [[Reduce]] (<source lang=apl inline>/</syntaxhighlight>) applied to a single operand <source lang=apl inline>=</syntaxhighlight>, and then to two arguments <source lang=apl inline>2</syntaxhighlight> and <source lang=apl inline>1 2 2 3</syntaxhighlight>. We say it is a "monadic operator called dyadically".


When called monadically, a monadic operator with an array operand has the same syntax as a [[dyadic function]]: in each case, there is one array to the left and one to the right of the operator or function. The difference is that while the value on the right is always an [[argument]], the one on the left is an [[operand]] to the operator but an argument to the function. This means that the operator can be applied in two steps: in most modern dialects the operand and its operator can be separated, for example changing the [[Constant operator]] call <source lang=apl inline>A ⍨ B</source> to <source lang=apl inline>toA←A ⍨ ⋄ toA B</source>, but few allow the array-function combination that would be required to change the equivalent [[Identity]] call <source lang=apl inline>A ⊢ B</source> to <source lang=apl inline>toA←A ⊢ ⋄ toA B</source>. In some dialects this ambiguity is used to allow [[function-operator overloading]], where a value can be either a monadic operator or a dyadic function depending on context.
When called monadically, a monadic operator with an array operand has the same syntax as a [[dyadic function]]: in each case, there is one array to the left and one to the right of the operator or function. The difference is that while the value on the right is always an [[argument]], the one on the left is an [[operand]] to the operator but an argument to the function. This means that the operator can be applied in two steps: in most modern dialects the operand and its operator can be separated, for example changing the [[Constant operator]] call <source lang=apl inline>A ⍨ B</syntaxhighlight> to <source lang=apl inline>toA←A ⍨ ⋄ toA B</syntaxhighlight>, but few allow the array-function combination that would be required to change the equivalent [[Identity]] call <source lang=apl inline>A ⊢ B</syntaxhighlight> to <source lang=apl inline>toA←A ⊢ ⋄ toA B</syntaxhighlight>. In some dialects this ambiguity is used to allow [[function-operator overloading]], where a value can be either a monadic operator or a dyadic function depending on context.
== Operand currying ==
== Operand currying ==
Some dialects allow [[wikipedia:currying|currying]] one operand to a dyadic operator, creating a monadic operator:
Some dialects allow [[wikipedia:currying|currying]] one operand to a dyadic operator, creating a monadic operator:
Line 10: Line 10:
       1 +Thrice 4
       1 +Thrice 4
7
7
</source>
</syntaxhighlight>
Some dialects only allow currying the right operand.
Some dialects only allow currying the right operand.
{{APL syntax}}[[Category:Operators]]
{{APL syntax}}[[Category:Operators]]

Navigation menu