# Difference between revisions of "Function composition"

m |
(fix atop link) |
||

Line 1: | Line 1: | ||

− | '''Function composition''' refers to the "gluing" together of two [[function]]s using a [[dyadic operator]] such that the functions are applied to the [[argument]](s) as normal, but in a particular pattern specific to the used [[operator]]. The term [[wikipedia:function composition|function composition]] comes from [[traditional mathematics]] where it is used for a function <math>h(x)=f(g(x))</math> when written as <math> h(x) = (f \circ g)(x)</math>. APL generalises this idea to [[dyadic function]]s, allowing various patterns of application in addition to the simple application of one [[monadic function]] to the result of another monadic function. The three main patterns, represented by [[Atop]], [[Beside]], and [[Over]] can be visualised as follows: | + | '''Function composition''' refers to the "gluing" together of two [[function]]s using a [[dyadic operator]] such that the functions are applied to the [[argument]](s) as normal, but in a particular pattern specific to the used [[operator]]. The term [[wikipedia:function composition|function composition]] comes from [[traditional mathematics]] where it is used for a function <math>h(x)=f(g(x))</math> when written as <math> h(x) = (f \circ g)(x)</math>. APL generalises this idea to [[dyadic function]]s, allowing various patterns of application in addition to the simple application of one [[monadic function]] to the result of another monadic function. The three main patterns, represented by [[Atop (operator)|Atop]], [[Beside]], and [[Over]] can be visualised as follows: |

:[[File:Compositions.png|frameless|497px]] | :[[File:Compositions.png|frameless|497px]] |

## Revision as of 08:28, 22 November 2021

**Function composition** refers to the "gluing" together of two functions using a dyadic operator such that the functions are applied to the argument(s) as normal, but in a particular pattern specific to the used operator. The term function composition comes from traditional mathematics where it is used for a function when written as . APL generalises this idea to dyadic functions, allowing various patterns of application in addition to the simple application of one monadic function to the result of another monadic function. The three main patterns, represented by Atop, Beside, and Over can be visualised as follows:

When any of these are applied monadically, the dotted branch falls away, and they are all equivalent to each other and to of traditional mathematics.

## Additional compositions

Additional compositions are possible, even without using an argument more than once or applying a function to its own result. However, most of these are rather trivial shuffled-around versions of the above three. For example, one could define an operator identical to Atop, only that it applies the right operand to the result of the left operand, that is `{⍵⍵ ⍺ ⍺⍺ ⍵}`

.

Of note is Reverse-compose `⍛`

(also called *Before*), which is the mirrored version of Beside `∘`

(also known as *Compose* and *After*), because it is the only such variation that has been implemented, namely in dzaima/APL and Extended Dyalog APL.

A compositional operator that isn't just a shuffled around version of the basic three, is one that applies one operand between the other operand's dyadic result and the result of that other operand's result when swapped: `{(⍵ ⍵⍵ ⍺) ⍺⍺ (⍺ ⍵⍵ ⍵)}`

. This operator can for example be used to implement three-way comparison:

```
S ← {(⍵ ⍵⍵ ⍺) ⍺⍺ (⍺ ⍵⍵ ⍵)}
cmp ← -S≤
2 cmp 3
¯1
3 cmp 3
0
4 cmp 3
1
```

## External links

- Dyalog '19: Tacit Techniques with Dyalog version 18.0 Operators
- Dyalog webinar: Language Features of Dyalog version 18.0 in Depth