Find: Difference between revisions

From APL Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Add model that reflects common implementation.)
m (Text replacement - "</source>" to "</syntaxhighlight>")
Line 27: Line 27:
       WEEK⍷'DAY'  ⍝ WEEK not found in 'DAY'; left arg may have higher rank but it is never found
       WEEK⍷'DAY'  ⍝ WEEK not found in 'DAY'; left arg may have higher rank but it is never found
0 0 0
0 0 0
</source>
</syntaxhighlight>


For [[nested array|nested arrays]], Find tests for exact [[match]] between the elements.
For [[nested array|nested arrays]], Find tests for exact [[match]] between the elements.
Line 34: Line 34:
       'BIRDS' 'NEST'⍷'BIRDS' 'NEST' 'SOUP'
       'BIRDS' 'NEST'⍷'BIRDS' 'NEST' 'SOUP'
1 0 0
1 0 0
</source>
</syntaxhighlight>


== Model ==
== Model ==
Line 46: Line 46:
  (⍴⍵) ↑ ⍺∘{⍺≡(⍴⍺)↑⍵↓ww}¨ ⍳(×⍴⍺)+(⍴⍵)-⍴⍺
  (⍴⍵) ↑ ⍺∘{⍺≡(⍴⍺)↑⍵↓ww}¨ ⍳(×⍴⍺)+(⍴⍵)-⍴⍺
}
}
</source>
</syntaxhighlight>
=== Empty left argument ===
=== Empty left argument ===
Implementations differ in their treatment of empty left arguments:
Implementations differ in their treatment of empty left arguments:
Line 53: Line 53:
* [[APL+]] finds empty arrays everywhere, even where they would extend beyond the edges of the right argument.
* [[APL+]] finds empty arrays everywhere, even where they would extend beyond the edges of the right argument.


The prototype is never used, in contrast to [[Match]], which in many APLs compares prototypes of empty arrays. The behavior may come from the use of the [[inner product]] <source lang=apl inline>∧.=</source> in early [[Array_model#Flat_array_theory|flat]] APLs where [[Match]] is not a primitive; this function naturally checks elements and not the prototype. [[Adin Falkoff]] presented code for Find-like functions using <source lang=apl inline>∧.=</source> at [[APL79]].<ref>[[Adin Falkoff|Falkoff, Adin]]. [https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/390009.804448 A note on pattern matching: Where do you find the match to an empty array?] at [[APL79]].</ref>
The prototype is never used, in contrast to [[Match]], which in many APLs compares prototypes of empty arrays. The behavior may come from the use of the [[inner product]] <source lang=apl inline>∧.=</syntaxhighlight> in early [[Array_model#Flat_array_theory|flat]] APLs where [[Match]] is not a primitive; this function naturally checks elements and not the prototype. [[Adin Falkoff]] presented code for Find-like functions using <source lang=apl inline>∧.=</syntaxhighlight> at [[APL79]].<ref>[[Adin Falkoff|Falkoff, Adin]]. [https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/390009.804448 A note on pattern matching: Where do you find the match to an empty array?] at [[APL79]].</ref>


Correspondingly, the above model can be amended to match the behaviour of the primitive (in APL2, etc.) by replacing the <source lang=apl inline>≡</source> with <source lang=apl inline>{(⍺≡⍥⍴⍵)∧(∧/⍺≡¨⍥,⍵)}</source> which ignores prototypes, only comparing shape and elements:<ref>[[Adám Brudzewsky|Brudzewsky, Adám]]. [https://forums.dyalog.com/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=1735&p=7416#p7416 RE: ⍷ follies]. Dyalog Forums. 23 Aug 2022.</ref>
Correspondingly, the above model can be amended to match the behaviour of the primitive (in APL2, etc.) by replacing the <source lang=apl inline>≡</syntaxhighlight> with <source lang=apl inline>{(⍺≡⍥⍴⍵)∧(∧/⍺≡¨⍥,⍵)}</syntaxhighlight> which ignores prototypes, only comparing shape and elements:<ref>[[Adám Brudzewsky|Brudzewsky, Adám]]. [https://forums.dyalog.com/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=1735&p=7416#p7416 RE: ⍷ follies]. Dyalog Forums. 23 Aug 2022.</ref>
<source lang=apl>
<source lang=apl>
ebar2←{⎕IO←0
ebar2←{⎕IO←0
Line 64: Line 64:
  (⍴⍵) ↑ ⍺∘{⍺ {(⍺≡⍥⍴⍵)∧(∧/⍺≡¨⍥,⍵)} (⍴⍺)↑⍵↓ww}¨ ⍳(×⍴⍺)+(⍴⍵)-⍴⍺
  (⍴⍵) ↑ ⍺∘{⍺ {(⍺≡⍥⍴⍵)∧(∧/⍺≡¨⍥,⍵)} (⍴⍺)↑⍵↓ww}¨ ⍳(×⍴⍺)+(⍴⍵)-⍴⍺
}
}
</source>
</syntaxhighlight>
== See also ==
== See also ==
* [[Membership]]
* [[Membership]]

Revision as of 21:01, 10 September 2022

Find () is a dyadic primitive function which indicates where the left argument appears as a contiguous subarray of the right argument.

Examples

Both arguments can be arrays of any shape. The entire left argument is tested against each position in the right argument. The result is a boolean array having the same shape as the right argument, where a 1 indicates the position of the first element of the matched subarray (which can be seen as the "leftmost" or "top left" position in case of a vector or matrix). If the left argument has lower rank, it is treated as if the shape is prepended with ones. If the left argument has higher rank, Find does not error, but it is never found in the right argument (resulting in an all-zero array).

<source lang=apl>

     'ANA'⍷'BANANA'  ⍝ Matches may overlap

0 1 0 1 0 0

     WEEK

SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY

     'DAY'⍷WEEK  ⍝ Find the pattern 'DAY' in WEEK; right arg may have higher rank

0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

     WEEK⍷'DAY'  ⍝ WEEK not found in 'DAY'; left arg may have higher rank but it is never found

0 0 0 </syntaxhighlight>

For nested arrays, Find tests for exact match between the elements.

<source lang=apl>

     'BIRDS' 'NEST'⍷'BIRDS' 'NEST' 'SOUP'

1 0 0 </syntaxhighlight>

Model

Find can be modelled as follows (for non-empty left arguments), where all possible subarrays of the right argument are checked to see if they match the left argument:[1] <source lang=apl> ebar←{⎕IO←0

r←(≢⍴⍺)⌈≢⍴⍵                    ⍝ maximum rank
r>≢⍴⍺:(⍺⍴⍨(⍴⍺),⍨(r-≢⍴⍺)⍴1)∇ ⍵  ⍝ if ⍺ has lesser  rank, make it the same rank
(⍴⍺)∨.>r↑(⍴⍵),¯1:(⍴⍵)⍴0        ⍝ return 0s if ⍺ has greater rank or is longer
ww←⍵
(⍴⍵) ↑ ⍺∘{⍺≡(⍴⍺)↑⍵↓ww}¨ ⍳(×⍴⍺)+(⍴⍵)-⍴⍺

} </syntaxhighlight>

Empty left argument

Implementations differ in their treatment of empty left arguments:

  • APL2, GNU APL, NARS2000, and Dyalog APL indicate positions where the left argument can fit, even if the prototypes don't match.
  • APLX never finds any empty arrays.
  • APL+ finds empty arrays everywhere, even where they would extend beyond the edges of the right argument.

The prototype is never used, in contrast to Match, which in many APLs compares prototypes of empty arrays. The behavior may come from the use of the inner product <source lang=apl inline>∧.=</syntaxhighlight> in early flat APLs where Match is not a primitive; this function naturally checks elements and not the prototype. Adin Falkoff presented code for Find-like functions using <source lang=apl inline>∧.=</syntaxhighlight> at APL79.[2]

Correspondingly, the above model can be amended to match the behaviour of the primitive (in APL2, etc.) by replacing the <source lang=apl inline>≡</syntaxhighlight> with <source lang=apl inline>{(⍺≡⍥⍴⍵)∧(∧/⍺≡¨⍥,⍵)}</syntaxhighlight> which ignores prototypes, only comparing shape and elements:[3] <source lang=apl> ebar2←{⎕IO←0

r←(≢⍴⍺)⌈≢⍴⍵                    ⍝ maximum rank
r>≢⍴⍺:(⍺⍴⍨(⍴⍺),⍨(r-≢⍴⍺)⍴1)∇ ⍵  ⍝ if ⍺ has lesser  rank, make it the same rank
(⍴⍺)∨.>r↑(⍴⍵),¯1:(⍴⍵)⍴0        ⍝ return 0s if ⍺ has greater rank or is longer
ww←⍵
(⍴⍵) ↑ ⍺∘{⍺ {(⍺≡⍥⍴⍵)∧(∧/⍺≡¨⍥,⍵)} (⍴⍺)↑⍵↓ww}¨ ⍳(×⍴⍺)+(⍴⍵)-⍴⍺

} </syntaxhighlight>

See also

External links

Documentation

References

APL built-ins [edit]
Primitives (Timeline) Functions
Scalar
Monadic ConjugateNegateSignumReciprocalMagnitudeExponentialNatural LogarithmFloorCeilingFactorialNotPi TimesRollTypeImaginarySquare Root
Dyadic AddSubtractTimesDivideResiduePowerLogarithmMinimumMaximumBinomialComparison functionsBoolean functions (And, Or, Nand, Nor) ∙ GCDLCMCircularComplexRoot
Non-Scalar
Structural ShapeReshapeTallyDepthRavelEnlistTableCatenateReverseRotateTransposeRazeMixSplitEncloseNestCut (K)PairLinkPartitioned EnclosePartition
Selection FirstPickTakeDropUniqueIdentityStopSelectReplicateExpandSet functions (IntersectionUnionWithout) ∙ Bracket indexingIndexCartesian ProductSort
Selector Index generatorGradeIndex OfInterval IndexIndicesDealPrefix and suffix vectors
Computational MatchNot MatchMembershipFindNub SieveEncodeDecodeMatrix InverseMatrix DivideFormatExecuteMaterialiseRange
Operators Monadic EachCommuteConstantReplicateExpandReduceWindowed ReduceScanOuter ProductKeyI-BeamSpawnFunction axis
Dyadic BindCompositions (Compose, Reverse Compose, Beside, Withe, Atop, Over) ∙ Inner ProductDeterminantPowerAtUnderRankDepthVariantStencilCutDirect definition (operator)
Quad names Index originComparison toleranceMigration levelAtomic vector