Talk:Split composition: Difference between revisions

From APL Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "I suggest this construct is instead called a pattern - ''a'' split composition which encapsulates Over. Where the left tine of a fork branches to the left argument, and vica-verca. This seems more sensible to me. --Faun (talk) 2:23, 20 September 2022 (UTC)")
 
m (Faun Locke moved page Talk:Split-compose to Talk:Split composition: Generalizing the topic)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
I suggest this construct is instead called a pattern - ''a'' split composition which encapsulates [[Over]]. Where the left tine of a fork branches to the left argument, and vica-verca. This seems more sensible to me. --[[User:Faun Locke|Faun]] ([[User talk:Faun Locke|talk]]) 2:23, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
I suggest this construct is instead called a pattern - ''a'' split composition which encapsulates [[Over]]. One where the left tine of a fork branches to the left argument, and vice versa. This seems more sensible to me. --[[User:Faun Locke|Faun]] ([[User talk:Faun Locke|talk]]) 2:29, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 12:13, 20 September 2022

I suggest this construct is instead called a pattern - a split composition which encapsulates Over. One where the left tine of a fork branches to the left argument, and vice versa. This seems more sensible to me. --Faun (talk) 2:29, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Retrieved from ‘https://aplwiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Split_composition&oldid=9762’