Talk:Split composition: Difference between revisions

From APL Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "I suggest this construct is instead called a pattern - ''a'' split composition which encapsulates Over. Where the left tine of a fork branches to the left argument, and vica-verca. This seems more sensible to me. --Faun (talk) 2:23, 20 September 2022 (UTC)")
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I suggest this construct is instead called a pattern - ''a'' split composition which encapsulates [[Over]]. Where the left tine of a fork branches to the left argument, and vica-verca. This seems more sensible to me. --[[User:Faun Locke|Faun]] ([[User talk:Faun Locke|talk]]) 2:23, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
I suggest this construct is instead called a pattern - ''a'' split composition which encapsulates [[Over]]. One where the left tine of a fork branches to the left argument, and vica-verca. This seems more sensible to me. --[[User:Faun Locke|Faun]] ([[User talk:Faun Locke|talk]]) 2:29, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:30, 20 September 2022

I suggest this construct is instead called a pattern - a split composition which encapsulates Over. One where the left tine of a fork branches to the left argument, and vica-verca. This seems more sensible to me. --Faun (talk) 2:29, 20 September 2022 (UTC)