Talk:Niladic function: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "''A niladic function is the only possible named entity with this behaviour:'' no, also properties. ~~~~") |
m (Text replacement - "</source>" to "</syntaxhighlight>") |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''A niladic function is the only possible named entity with this behaviour:'' no, also properties. [[User:Adám Brudzewsky|Adám Brudzewsky]] ([[User talk:Adám Brudzewsky|talk]]) 11:14, 15 March 2020 (UTC) | ''A niladic function is the only possible named entity with this behaviour:'' no, also properties. [[User:Adám Brudzewsky|Adám Brudzewsky]] ([[User talk:Adám Brudzewsky|talk]]) 11:14, 15 March 2020 (UTC) | ||
Hmm, do those actually count? You can't refer to them with a single name: you have to write <syntaxhighlight lang=apl inline>obj.prop</syntaxhighlight> (unless I'm mistaken). Probably worth mentioning as a similar construct, but I'm not so sure the statement is wrong. --[[User:Marshall|Marshall]] ([[User talk:Marshall|talk]]) 09:49, 16 March 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:47, 11 September 2022
A niladic function is the only possible named entity with this behaviour: no, also properties. Adám Brudzewsky (talk) 11:14, 15 March 2020 (UTC)
Hmm, do those actually count? You can't refer to them with a single name: you have to write obj.prop (unless I'm mistaken). Probably worth mentioning as a similar construct, but I'm not so sure the statement is wrong. --Marshall (talk) 09:49, 16 March 2020 (UTC)