User:⊂⍺m: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
657 bytes added ,  20:33, 10 July 2023
Line 18: Line 18:
This is on the back-burner for now, but I’m very much looking forward to exploring and mastering these fascinating subjects with APL! I’m sure I’ll end up building an APL-oriented course for each subject as I go through it, which I can then share with others. To me this style seems like the future of teaching/learning math-related subjects.  
This is on the back-burner for now, but I’m very much looking forward to exploring and mastering these fascinating subjects with APL! I’m sure I’ll end up building an APL-oriented course for each subject as I go through it, which I can then share with others. To me this style seems like the future of teaching/learning math-related subjects.  


Also, I am particularly keen on helping to make learning these languages more accessible to others.  
Also, I am particularly keen on helping to make learning these languages more accessible to others.
 
I ended up finding APL at the perfect time, right as Dyalog is filling in (at least most of) the remaining gaps in J's/BQN's combinator lexicon (atop, over, dyadic reverse-compose)! I feel like this is an exciting time for array languages, given recent developments like the creation of exploratory resources like APL Wiki, TryAPL, and the ArrayCast podcast; the online "learn APL" books; the J-inspired additions/extensions to Dyalog; the creation of Extended Dyalog, BQN, and dzaima/APL, which collectively extend the notation itself; the creation of Co-dfns, April, and ngn/APL; and the array-oriented tree manipulation strategies introduced by Co-dfns.


== Potential future projects ==
== Potential future projects ==
trusted
83

edits

Navigation menu